Kisi, K P; Mani, N; Rojas, E M and Foster, E T (2017) Optimal productivity in labor-intensive construction operations: Pilot study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(3): 04016107, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Optimal productivity is the highest sustainable productivity level achievable under good management and typical working conditions. Accordingly, optimal productivity provides the foundation for determining the absolute efficiency of construction operations because an accurate estimate of optimal productivity enables the comparison between actual versus optimal rather than actual versus historical productivity. This research contributes to the current body of knowledge by introducing a two-prong strategy for estimating optimal productivity in labor-intensive construction operations and by applying this strategy to a pilot study on the replacement of electrical lighting fixtures. The first prong, or top-down approach, estimates the upper limit of optimal productivity by introducing system inefficiencies into the productivity frontier - the productivity achieved under perfect conditions. This study uses a qualitative factor model to identify this upper limit. The second prong, or bottom-up approach, estimates the lower limit of optimal productivity by taking away operational inefficiencies from actual productivity - productivity recorded in the field. A discrete-event simulation model provides this lower-limit value. An average of the upper and lower limits yields the best estimate of optimal productivity. This paper reviews relevant literature, presents the details of both the top-down and bottom-up approaches, analyzes the data from a pilot project, evaluates the feasibility of this two-prong strategy, and finally provides a novel framework for project managers who want to accurately estimate the optimal productivity of their labor-intensive construction operations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management; labor and personnel issues; methodology; productivity; simulation |
| Index terms: | personnel, strategy, methodology, replacement, estimating, body of knowledge, project manager, efficiency, construction operation, productivity, working conditions, qualitative factor, bottom-up approach, estimate |
| Subjects: | materials science, profession, financial and cost management, data analysis and analytics, knowledge management, construction operations, urban planning, employment law, research methods, performance management, management |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Site Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Governance, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here