Liu, J; Yang, P; Xia, B and Skitmore, M (2017) Effect of perceived justice on subcontractor willingness to cooperate: The mediating role of relationship value. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(9): 04017062, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Cooperation between subcontractors and the general contractor provides the foundation for the successful delivery of every construction project. As one of the most important factors influencing subcontractor behavioral intentions, perceived justice from previous collaborative experience affects the willingness of a subcontractor to cooperate with a general contractor in the future. In this paper, a model is built based on social exchange theory to examine the relationship between justice perception, relationship value, and subcontractor willingness to cooperate (WTC). Analysis of data from 122 subcontractors demonstrates that distributive justice and interactional justice positively affect WTC, and relationship value from the general contractor partially mediates such effects. However, procedural justice does not significantly affect WTC. The study provides a new perspective for examining the internal mechanisms between subcontractor justice perception and WTC. The findings will also help general contractors understand how their behaviors affect subcontractor WTC, thus providing practical implications for subcontracting management.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contracting; perceived justice; relationship value; social exchange theory; subcontractor; willingness to cooperate |
| Index terms: | social exchange theory, subcontracting, cooperation, subcontractor, construction project, general contractor, justice |
| Subjects: | production management, social theory, organization, practitioner, psychology, legal systems |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Supply Chain Management, Organizational Design, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here