Love, P E D; Veli, S; Davis, P; Teo, P and Morrison, J (2017) See the difference in a precast facility: Changing mindsets with an experiential safety program. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(2): 05016021, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The AU$8.3 billion Sydney Metro Northwest Rail Link is Australia's largest public transport project and includes the construction of twin 15-km tunnels. A temporary precast facility was constructed to produce the wall-linings for the tunnels. The facility is operated 24 h a day from Monday to Friday and 12 h on Saturday with 100 workers. To enhance the safety performance within the facility, an experiential learning safety program referred to as See the Difference was implemented in conjunction with other safety interventions, although the program was the glue that held all initiatives together. This paper describes the safety program and examines its effectiveness and contribution it made toward reducing incidents and engendering teamwork within the temporary precast facility. It was observed that the See the Difference program had a positive influence on changing the mindset of the workforce from a fixed one to one of growth, which was developed through a process of coaching. The paper draws on actual practice and presents a novel approach to improving safety through the introduction of an experiential safety program. The case study offers a learning opportunity for other organizations that are confronted with implementing safety awareness programs, particularly for infrastructure transportation megaprojects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | coaching; developmental program; experiential learning; incidents; labor and personnel issues; mindset; precast yard; safety |
| Index terms: | effectiveness, Australia, teamwork, case study, megaproject, safety performance, program, mindset, tunnel, public transport, personnel, experiential learning |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, learning methods, health behaviours and lifestyles, strategic project management, software systems, performance management, management, Geography, occupational health and safety management, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Human Resources, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Education, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here