Luo, X; Li, H; Dai, F; Cao, D; Yang, X and Guo, H (2017) Hierarchical Bayesian model of worker response to proximity warnings of construction safety hazards: Toward constant review of safety risk control measures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(6): 04017006, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Quickly changing and complicated workplace conditions, which are typical of construction projects, have always been contributing to the poor safety record of the construction industry. However, few of the existing approaches to reviewing control measures take into account or effectively tackle these conditions. This paper introduces a three-level (i.e., individual hazards, hazard types, and generic hazards) hierarchical Bayesian model based on workers' responses to proximity warnings of safety hazards to address the problem. The proposed model distinguishes between two uses of proximity warnings (i.e., as the primary control measure and as the secondary measure), uses observational response rates as input, takes into account prior knowledge of workers' responses to similar hazards, and produces estimated response rates (ERRs). These ERRs are the primary indicator of the effectiveness of a given control measure as well as of the validity of a previously identified safety hazard. A 17-day field experiment was conducted to test the proposed approach, preliminarily using a location-based proximity warning system to warn workers of safety hazards and record their responses to warnings. The experimental results demonstrated the potential of the proposed approach. The limitations of the present analysis and the directions for future research are also discussed.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | control measure review; hierarchical Bayesian modeling; labor and personnel issues; proximity warning system; safety risk management |
| Index terms: | validity, construction industry, modelling, effectiveness, risk management, experiment, personnel, construction safety, construction project |
| Subjects: | risk assessment, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, analytical methods, management, performance management, production management, industry analysis, environmental health |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Quality Management, Sustainability, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here