Safety performance in the construction industry: Quasi-longitudinal study

McCabe, B Y; Alderman, E; Chen, Y; Hyatt, D E and Shahi, A (2017) Safety performance in the construction industry: Quasi-longitudinal study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(4): 04016113, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Safety remains a major challenge in the construction industry throughout the world, yet there are very few longitudinal or quasi-longitudinal studies in this domain. This paper demonstrates how a quasi-longitudinal study can provide insight into safety performance. A comparison is made between two cross-sectional studies: 911 questionnaires collected from construction workers between 2004 and 2006, and 802 collected between 2014 and 2015 in Ontario, Canada. The data comprised demographic factors, 13 safety climate factors, and three safety outcome categories. Rates of injury, stress, and safety events reduced overall since 2004, although the change was significant only for events. Findings show improved consistency in safety awareness among participants independent of employers, suggesting that regionwide safety programs have been effective. Safety climate factors accounted for 15-20% of the variance in safety outcomes, down from 2004. Interpersonal conflict at work is strongly related to all safety outcome types. Participants with 11-15 years of experience reported the highest safety incident rates in all categories, a trend that was not observed 10 years earlier. Safety managers may consider broadening their safety programs, which often target new workers, to ensure that all workers are reminded of safe work practices.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction safety climate; labor and personnel issues; quasi-longitudinal study; safety outcomes
Index terms: manager, personnel, safety climate, injury, questionnaire, construction safety, safety programs, safety performance, variance, Canada, demographic factor, construction industry, safe work practice, construction worker
Subjects: practitioner, data collection methods, environmental health, industry analysis, measurement and scaling, health conditions and diseases, occupational health and safety management, demography, Geography, health safety and environment, management
Topics: Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Urban Studies, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here