Mental models of construction workers for safety-sign representation

Ng, A W Y and Chan, A H S (2017) Mental models of construction workers for safety-sign representation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(2): 04016091, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Previous studies have found that construction workers have considerable difficulties in safety-sign comprehension. This research examines the mental models of construction workers regarding safety-sign representations, and how user factors and referent characteristics affects these mental models. Twenty-two Hong Kong Chinese construction workers drew their mental models (pictures of the perceptions that came to mind) for 12 sign referents and described verbally their drawings. The influences of the four referent characteristics to mental model formation were not equivalent. Concreteness was the best predictor, followed by ease of visualization, familiarity, and context availability. The higher the visual imagery vividness of construction workers, the higher the proportion of their mental models for sign referents that were recognized as stereotypes. Other user factors had no significant effect on mental model formation. This knowledge of how user mental models of sign referents and how the representation was built in user minds would be beneficial for practitioners to enable better processing and practicing mental model approaches to safety-signs design for use in sites.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction worker; ergonomics; labor and personnel issues; mental model; safety intervention; safety sign
Index terms: construction worker, stereotype, Hong Kong, mental model, practitioner, ergonomics, visualization, personnel, drawing
Subjects: technical documentation, practitioner, sociology, cognitive psychology, occupational health and safety management, Geography, design practice, management
Topics: Human Resources, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here