Praticò, F G (2017) Metrics for management of asphalt plant sustainability. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(4): 04016116, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Assessing the sustainability status of an asphalt production facility is a vital issue that interrelates with the quality of hot-mix asphalt (HMA). In-plant production depends on a number of technical, personnel, and management issues. Controlling HMA production and producers (contractors) is a difficult task for which a qualifications-based selection system could be a viable solution. Consequently, the objective of this study is to set up and validate a method for assessing the sustainability of an asphalt plant. The new model was set up and based on a synergistic consideration of economic and environmental factors. The model allows the derivation of an innovative scoring system in which internal (nonenvironmental) and environmental requirements are considered. The primary contributions to the body of knowledge are the following: (1) the method is built on the derivation of a combined and modular ranking system; (2) it is based on a framework that identifies the links between problem and outcome; and (3) unlike traditional multicriteria analysis, it combines the summation and running of the product. Consequently, this study can be used to obtain knowledge of asphalt plant sustainability including economic perspectives and environmental concerns. A simple spreadsheet was designed and used for model implementation. The outcome of the research can benefit practitioners, researchers, road and environmental agencies, and authorities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | asphalt plant; multicriteria analysis; pavement; prequalification; road; sustainability; sustainable construction; transportation infrastructures |
| Index terms: | implementation, transportation infrastructure, environmental concern, multicriteria analysis, spreadsheet, qualification, environmental factor, agency, body of knowledge, practitioner, personnel, management issue, sustainable construction |
| Subjects: | environmental science, contractual arrangements, knowledge management, data science, environmental issues, practitioner, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, decision analysis, sustainable construction, management, educational resources |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Sustainability, Human Resources, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here