Genetic algorithm-simulation framework for decision making in construction site layout planning

Razavialavi, S and Abourizk, S (2017) Genetic algorithm-simulation framework for decision making in construction site layout planning. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(1): 04016084, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Site layout planning is a complicated task in many construction projects because of the diversity of decision variables, conflicting objectives, and the variety of possible solutions. This paper describes a framework that facilitates decision making on site-layout planning problems. The framework consists of three phases: (1) functionality evaluation phase (FEP), which qualitatively evaluates using a new method; (2) cost evaluation phase (CEP), which quantitatively evaluates the goodness of the layouts using simulation; and (3) value evaluation phase (VEP), which selects the most desirable layout from both qualitative and quantitative aspects. This framework also takes advantage of heuristic optimization through genetic algorithm (GA) to search for the most qualified layouts within FEP. The primary contribution of this research is to introduce a novel method for evaluating quality of layouts, which more realistically model the closeness constraints, and consider size and location desirability in the evaluating function. Also, using simulation for estimating project cost improves the effectiveness of the framework in practice because simulation can model construction processes, uncertainties, resources, and dynamic interactions between various parameters. Applicability of the framework is demonstrated through a case study of the layout planning of a tunneling project.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: genetic algorithm; optimization; project planning and design; simulation; site layout planning
Index terms: site layout planning, interaction, effectiveness, case study, heuristic, estimating, project planning, decision-making, construction process, construction project, project cost, functionality, construction site, genetic algorithm
Subjects: decision analysis, building construction, behavioral psychology, economics, performance management, algorithms, production management, design features, work location, construction planning, financial and cost management, risk assessment, data collection methods, control systems
Topics: Digital Applications, Design Practice, Quality Management, Site Management, Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here