Roofigari-Esfahan, N and Razavi, S (2017) Uncertainty-aware linear schedule optimization: A space-time constraint-satisfaction approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(5): 04016132, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Schedules and physical workspaces are two key elements of linear construction projects that are extremely interdependent. Any negligence in incorporating spatial and temporal constraints in developing and improving schedules of linear projects results in inevitable delays and workspace congestions and can substantially hinder the performance of the activity resources. This study augments the current linear scheduling methods by presenting an uncertainty-aware optimization framework to optimize the duration of linear projects while minimizing their potential congestions. The methodology is built upon the new concept of space-time float for explicit consideration of spatio-temporal constraints of activities and their inherent uncertainty. A constraint satisfaction approach was used for the two-tier optimization of duration and congestion. A fuzzy inference system was also incorporated to assess the inherent uncertainty in the schedule. Two case examples from literature are analyzed. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method in planning and control of the unforeseen variations from planned schedules of linear projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | congestion; constraint programming; cost and schedule; fuzzy systems; linear schedule; optimization; productivity; space-time float; uncertainty |
| Index terms: | linear construction, negligence, fuzzy inference, spatio-temporal constraint, linear scheduling, methodology, variation, workspace, productivity, satisfaction, duration, effectiveness, constraint programming |
| Subjects: | operations research, project delivery, management, performance management, algorithms, research methods, contractual condition, production management, project controls, building construction, decision-making and optimization, liability law |
| Topics: | Time Control, Contract Administration, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Quality Management, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here