Rudeli, N; Santilli, A; Puente, I and Viles, E (2017) Statistical model for schedule prediction: Validation in a housing-cooperative construction database. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(11): 04017083, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
There are often considerable differences between the planned schedule for a construction project and what later develops during actual construction. This paper introduces an innovative approach that uses Markov Chain models to support predictions during earned value analyses. A statistical model was developed to predict possible deviations in a project schedule and the future progress of a project. This model, based on Markov chains, uses data from the past to adjust future predictions. A case study was built from a database of 90 housing cooperative construction projects and was validated in 12 more projects. A cross validation of three interactions was also carried out, obtaining an error of 2.38% in the prediction of future progress and an error of 4.29% in the prediction of construction timing. The innovative prediction model presented in this paper contributes to the management body of knowledge by introducing a new tool for the management and control of construction timing. The method presented improves construction management because it predicts future deviations in schedules with reduced errors and determines total deviation from a construction schedule with great precision. This allows better control over work timing and represents important input in determining strategies and future actions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost and schedule; earned schedule; earned value management; prediction; schedule |
| Index terms: | Markov chain, case study, deviation, database, statistical model, interaction, strategy, prediction model, earned value management, construction project, earned value analysis, validation, body of knowledge, housing |
| Subjects: | mathematical modelling, data collection methods, construction type, control systems, financial and cost management, prediction and forecasting, data science, knowledge management, management, professional development, production management, data management, behavioral psychology |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here