Shrestha, A; Chan, T K; Aibinu, A A; Chen, C and Martek, I (2017) Risks in PPP water projects in China: Perspective of local governments. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(7): 05017006, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
In the last decade, China has implemented more public-private partnership (PPP) projects in the water sector compared to other sectors. However, efficient management of risks in these projects remains problematic. While there have been many studies that have examined risks associated with PPPs in China, the experience of local governments with risks has received little or no attention in the literature. Moreover, the stages at which the risks are significant and how these risks are interrelated have not been researched. This paper examines risks as experienced from the local government's perspective and how they manifest across five PPP stages: (1) feasibility, (2) procurement, (3) construction, (4) operation, and (5) transfer. The interrelationship between the risks across the PPP stages is also examined. Data was collected via questionnaire surveys and interviews, and it was analyzed using quantitative and qualitative analysis. The findings reveal critical risk for local governments and how their impacts vary across project stages. Some of the risks influence other risks both within and across the five PPP stages. The findings provide significant insight into the dynamic nature risks in PPP water projects, which has important implications for practitioners when developing risk mitigation strategies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | inter-risk relationship; local government; organizational issues; project planning and design; public-private partnership; risk identification; water projects |
| Index terms: | partnership, risk relationship, organizational issue, local government, interview, strategy, survey, risk identification, practitioner, qualitative analysis, questionnaire, risk mitigation, China, project planning |
| Subjects: | partnership management, administrative law, management, financial risk, Geography, business, research design and methodology, data collection methods, control systems, practitioner |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Legal Issues, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here