Managing project performance risks under uncertainty: Using a dynamic capital structure approach in infrastructure project financing

Sundararajan, S K and Tseng, C L (2017) Managing project performance risks under uncertainty: Using a dynamic capital structure approach in infrastructure project financing. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(8): 04017046, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Infrastructure project financing and public-private partnerships (PPPs) are underpinned by risk allocation between the public and private sectors. Project performance risks are often passed to the private sector as a contractual risk transfer that is often deterministic and inflexible. In complex projects where there are uncertainties in the scope of work and capital costs, performance risks may need more flexibility with active management on the evolution of project uncertainties over the life of the project's development. Conventional fixed capital structures and project performance measurements cannot capture the evolution of project performance risks and their dynamics. This paper develops a dynamic capital structure approach that explicitly considers the performance risks of complex projects under uncertainty and allows the capital structure to be adjusted proactively to counter their impact on the project value. Unlike most models that focus on the operational phase when revenues are generated, this paper specifically considers the impact of project performance risks that occur during the development phase. This approach identifies the potential threat of default attributable to project performance risks and allows the private-sector-sponsored project company and lenders to make proactive management decisions using a real-options approach. Numerical results show that such a model can add significant value to a PPP project under uncertainty. Furthermore, numerical tests also show that with the flexibility in adjusting the capital structure, the probability of potential default can also be reduced.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: default, capital cost, project uncertainty, revenue, management decision, evolution, financing, private sector, partnership, risk allocation, project performance, dynamics, capital structure, option, complex project, infrastructure project
Subjects: dispute resolution, economic analysis, strategic project management, environmental science, accounting and finance, decision-making and reasoning, financial risk, project management theory and practice, decision analysis, partnership management, systems engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here