Relationships between main contractors and subcontractors and their impacts on main contractor competitiveness: An empirical study in Hong Kong

Tan, Y; Xue, B and Cheung, Y T (2017) Relationships between main contractors and subcontractors and their impacts on main contractor competitiveness: An empirical study in Hong Kong. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(7): 05017007, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Subcontracting is a common practice in the modern construction industry. The performance of construction projects will be adversely affected if the relationships between main contractors and subcontractors are not properly managed. Therefore, the relationships between main contractors and subcontractors are becoming more and more important to the success of construction projects. Based on a comprehensive questionnaire survey in the Hong Kong construction industry, the relationship between main contractors and subcontractors was studied. Main contractors in the local industry can be classified into four clusters according to the nature of their relationship with subcontractors, namely, adversarial, coopetitive, collaborative, and partnering. Furthermore, the impact of these relationships on main contractor competitiveness and the critical factors affecting collaborative/partnering relationships and main contractor competitiveness were also explored. The findings of this research reveal that good relationships with subcontractors are positively and advantageously associated with main contractor competitiveness. A long-term partnering relationship, based on win-win principles, is more likely to benefit both parties in construction practice.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: competitiveness; contracting; main contractor; relationship; subcontractor
Index terms: subcontracting, critical factor, Hong Kong, main contractor, partnering, becoming, construction industry, empirical study, competitiveness, survey, subcontractor, construction project, questionnaire
Subjects: industry analysis, philosophical process, market analysis, partnership management, Geography, production management, research methods, practitioner, risk assessment, data collection methods, organization
Topics: Supply Chain Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here