Aligning BIM with FM: Streamlining the process for future projects

Kasprzak, C and Dubler, C (2012) Aligning BIM with FM: Streamlining the process for future projects. Construction Economics and Building, 12(4), pp. 68-77. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

A study performed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), USA in 2004 found that owners account for approximately $10.6 billion of the $15.8 billion total inadequate interoperability costs of U.S. capital facility projects in 2002. Because of these inefficiency costs, it becomes vital that information produced during the design and construction phases of a project be transferred into operations with maximum leverage to the end users. However, very few owners have defined these informational needs or developed an integration strategy into existing maintenance management systems. To increase operational efficiency, an organization must first develop an understanding of their operating systems, as well as identify how Building Information Modeling (BIM) will add value to their daily tasks. The Pennsylvania State University (PSU) has a unique opportunity to diversely implement BIM processes because not only does the University act as an owner, but also as designer and construction manager on the majority of projects. The struggle that PSU faces is one that is unique only to owners with a large, existing, multifaceted building inventory. This paper outlines the current initiative by the Office of Physical Plant (OPP), the asset manager at PSU, to develop an information exchange framework between BIM and FM applications to be used internally. As a result of this research, PSU has been able to define owner operational requirements for future projects and develop a flexible integration framework to support additional BIM tasks and information exchanges.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building information modeling; facility management; owner; processes
Index terms: face, maintenance management system, strategy, interoperability, building information modelling, integration, manager, owner, designer, construction manager, information exchange, end user, inventory, streamlining, efficiency, design and construction
Subjects: psychology, contractual arrangements, stakeholder, sociology, performance management, information systems, practitioner, management, data science, profession, inventory management, systems and processes, organizational analysis
Topics: Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Procurement, Digital Applications, Stakeholder Management, Supply Chain Management, Roles and Professions, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here