Asset data handover for a large educational institution: Case-study approach

Thabet, W and Lucas, J (2017) Asset data handover for a large educational institution: Case-study approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(11): 05017017, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Owners of multiple facilities who maintain large capital portfolios are challenged with efficient maintenance to streamline operational processes and costs. Clearly defined and structured information documentation standards are needed before a project even starts to develop appropriate as-built documentation to support postconstruction operations. This paper documents a case study of a large educational institution that is exploring methods for adopting a building information model (BIM) for facility management (FM) approach for information management as a way to overcome inefficiencies in its current information processing methods. A multiphase process has been used in the development of a proposed BIM-based solution. This paper presents the data needs analysis that has been conducted with the first phase of the research project. The preliminary data capture and documentation methods are discussed in terms of a spreadsheet-based methodology that allows for easily identifying and tracking sources of information. A pilot study is also discussed that was used to validate the information needs and overall process. Future research steps of converting the spreadsheet-based methodology into a model-based approach allowing the FM department to directly link a BIM to its computerized maintenance and management system (CMMS) are also included. Specific challenges and lessons learned in the information collection process are also discussed in terms of how they have affected the overall process development.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building information modeling; facilities management; information technologies
Index terms: spreadsheet, documentation, methodology, documents, case study, owner, information technology, information processing, needs analysis, building information modelling, facilities management, management system, lessons learned
Subjects: data collection methods, professional development, management, information systems, scope management, research methods, sociology, data science, computing systems
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here