Mechanisms to initiate knowledge-sharing connections in communities of practice

Wanberg, J; Javernick-Will, A and Taylor, J E (2017) Mechanisms to initiate knowledge-sharing connections in communities of practice. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(11): 04017085, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Within many construction and engineering organizations, communities of practice (CoPs) have become an important means for managing knowledge. They are employed to connect employees with technical specialists, which should reduce repeated mistakes, improve technical practice, and generate thought leadership. While organizations often implement CoPs as a means for coordinating specialist knowledge, very little is known about how professionals actually locate and connect with one another, making it difficult for organizations to employ CoPs effectively. To better understand how professionals identify and connect with colleagues, this research first conducted social network analysis to identify existing connections within three intraorganizational CoPs comprised of 1,791 members in two organizations, and then conducted and analyzed 77 interviews about dyadic connections to determine how individuals within these CoPs connected. From this analysis, four mechanisms of connection were identified, including organizational control, organizational opportunity, social networks, and non-person-centered searching. These connection mechanisms include a hybrid of social and organizational structures, reinforcing the need to strategically create and manage CoPs in project-based organizations. More specifically, these conclusions suggest that managerial control within CoPs is still an important mechanism to facilitate knowledge-sharing connections within distributed CoPs.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: knowledge management; knowledge transfer; networks; organizational issues
Index terms: project-based organization, knowledge management, interview, social network, communities of practice, organizational issue, organizational structure, social network analysis, organizational control, knowledge transfer
Subjects: data collection methods, research methods, research dissemination and communication, organization, knowledge management, business, professional development, sociology
Topics: Digital Applications, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here