Wong, P S P; Zwar, C and Gharaie, E (2017) Examining the drivers and states of organizational change for greater use of prefabrication in construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(7): 04017020, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Many studies have focused on the technologies and reasoning behind off-site construction and failed to address the implications to organizational change. This papaer aims to investigate the readiness of construction project organizations (CPOs) to accommodate new project environments that demand a more extensive use of prefabrication. Semistructured interviews of project managers were conducted in Melbourne, Australia. The results indicate that CPOs were well aware of the need to change operational practices in order to capitalize on the positive effects of off-site construction. A variety of practice changes were also undertaken. However, CPOs appear to be failing to fully commit to the realization of organizational change because they focused primarily on planned approaches like revising policies and performance management systems. Emergent organizational change strategies like rewarding innovation and fostering bottom-up communication are still underdeveloped.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | enabling strategies; off-site construction; organizational change management; organizational issues |
| Index terms: | strategy, Australia, organizational change, organizational issue, reasoning, prefabrication, construction project, project manager, interview, performance management, off-site construction |
| Subjects: | management, cognitive psychology, Geography, data collection methods, business, profession, performance measurement, building construction, production management |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here