Life-cycle approach to collecting, managing, and sharing transportation infrastructure asset data

Yuan, C; McClure, T; Cai, H and Dunston, P S (2017) Life-cycle approach to collecting, managing, and sharing transportation infrastructure asset data. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(6): 04017001, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Transportation asset management (TAM) demands a data-driven decision-making process to proactively maintain, preserve, and extend the long-term service life of transportation assets. State highway agencies (SHAs) typically wait to inventory their assets according to their locations, dimensions, and material types and properties after they are constructed and open to traffic. However, the construction phase is the best time to collect asset data because access is easier and safer, and more importantly, the data needed for operation and maintenance (O&M) inventory already are being collected during the construction inspection and documentation process. Thus, finding a way to facilitate the flow of the asset data collected during construction to asset management information systems would not only eliminate the waste caused by the duplicate data collection efforts, but also ensure the safety of data collectors. Specifically, a linkage mechanism is needed to connect the planned assets in the design phase to the construction activities and then to the assets in the asset management systems for future use. Therefore, this paper introduces the framework for such a mechanism, which uses the construction pay items (i.e., measurable and specific construction work items for transportation assets). This proposed mechanism will enable sharing the construction records and as-built data of transportation infrastructure assets during construction and then sharing them with the downstream O&M applications. Four typical asset types (underdrains, guardrails, attenuators, and culverts) in a transportation project in Indiana were used to demonstrate its application. The results confirmed that the newly developed mechanism successfully integrated the asset data collection and documentation process into the current construction inspection process. It also eliminated the duplicate data collection efforts, which resulted in reducing asset inventory expenses in the short term and more effective asset management in the long term.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: civil integrated management; construction activities; information technologies; life cycle; pay items; plan assets; transportation asset management
Index terms: operation and maintenance, asset inventory, transportation project, asset management, documentation, agency, information system, data-driven decision-making, information technology, inventory, service life, linkage, construction activity, life cycle, inspection, transportation infrastructure, construction work, design phase, construction phase, dimension
Subjects: operations management, project delivery, health monitoring assessment and metrics, professional practice, construction operations, business, value management, computing systems, sociology, decision analysis, asset management, quality assurance, information systems, infrastructure and transport systems, maintenance engineering, professional development, inventory management
Topics: Site Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Supply Chain Management, Risk Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here