Castillo, T; Alarcón, L F and Salvatierra, J L (2018) Effects of last planner system practices on social networks and the performance of construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(3): 04017120, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Management practices of lean production within the last planner system (LPS) have enabled significant improvements in project performance worldwide. These improvements are, in part, attributed to practices that strengthen social networks within projects and enhance effective communication. However, the relationships by which LPS management practices and organizational characteristics impact project performance are not well known and require in-depth investigation. To obtain a better understanding of these relationships, analyzed data was collected from nine construction projects from two Chilean construction companies. Correlation analysis was applied to the degree of implementation of LPS practices, social networks metrics, and key performance indicators (KPIs). Significant relationships were found among these three variables. It was also found that a high implementation level of LPS practices is usually related to improved project performance, although it is not always associated with improved network metrics. The results provide insights into project performance relationships with the organization and LPS practices that should lead to improve the managerial decision-making process regarding organizational and management practices for better project performance. The role of social network properties on project performance requires further research because optimal metrics have not been established yet.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | key performance indicator; last planner system; management practices; organization; organizational issues; project performance; social networks |
| Index terms: | lean production, construction company, social network, construction project, last planner system, management practice, key performance indicator, correlation analysis, decision-making process, investigation, project performance, organizational issue, organizational characteristic, implementation |
| Subjects: | management, manufacturing engineering, production management, project management theory and practice, project controls, sociology, decision analysis, statistical analysis, data collection methods, organization, business, contractual arrangements, project delivery |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Procurement, Time Control, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here