Choi, B and Lee, S (2018) An empirically based agent-based model of the sociocognitive process of construction workers' safety behavior. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(2): 04017102, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Workers' unsafe behaviors have a substantial impact on construction safety. To regulate workers' unsafe behavior, construction practitioners have mainly used formal controls (e.g., penalties). However, the formal approaches may not be effective at eliciting desired behavioral changes in improving safety behavior. Therefore, recently, researchers have paid more attention to how unsafe behaviors are produced. In this regard, cognitive models of safety behavior and empirical evidence on social influence have been suggested. However, there is a noticeable paucity of research investigating the mechanism behind the link between cognitive process, social influence, site risk, and safety behavior. In this paper, an empirically based agent-based model that incorporates theoretical and empirical findings of the sociocognitive process of workers' safety behaviors is developed. The model is used to conduct experiments examining how the sociocognitive process interacts with safety management interventions (i.e., strictness and frequency of management feedback, and project identification) and influences workers' safety behaviors across different site risk conditions (i.e., low-, modest-, and high-risk conditions). The results demonstrated that all three interventions contribute to decreasing the incident rate. Also, the interaction effects of the interventions in different site risk conditions were found using the parameter sweeping. The results indicated that (1) promoting workers' project identification would be an effective strategy in the modest-risk site condition; (2) other interventions should be combined after achieving the medium strictness of management feedback in the high-risk site condition; and (3) other interventions would not be effective without very strict management feedback in the low-risk site condition. This paper contributes to the body of knowledge on construction safety by extending the authors' understanding of the role of sociocognitive process and its interaction with the environment in shaping workers' safety behaviors. Additionally, the experiment results are expected to lay a strong foundation for developing effective safety management interventions in the construction projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | agent-based modeling; labor and personnel issues; safety behavior; safety management; sociocognitive process |
| Index terms: | agent-based modelling, safety behaviour, interaction, construction worker, strategy, experiment, construction practitioner, personnel, penalty, unsafe behaviour, agent, body of knowledge, safety management, construction safety, construction project, evidence |
| Subjects: | management, financial risk, professional development, production management, occupational health and safety management, environmental health, behavioral psychology, regulatory law, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, practitioner, modelling and simulation, knowledge management |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Human Resources, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here