Doloi, H (2018) Community-centric model for evaluating social value in projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(5): 04018019, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Increasing public participation in infrastructure projects elicits the need for a rationalized approach for quantifying value creation in the societal context. Although economic and environmental viability may be relatively easy to quantify, theories for quantitative evaluation of social performance and underlying social value creation in public infrastructure projects from a community perspective remain unexplored. This paper argues that the needs and requirements of the community should be at the core in planning for infrastructure projects. The success and failure of these projects should be intrinsically linked to the social value being created for the community at large. Addressing this knowledge gap, this paper develops a community-centric framework by considering public viewpoints at the core of infrastructure planning across a range of project characteristics. Based on social network theory, four key stakeholder networks - interest, impact, communication, and satisfaction networks - are investigated and the underlying network measures are then used to compute mathematically the social performance index (SPI) of the entire project. The SPI is then compared with a threshold value so that an acceptable level of social performance can be ensured while planning the project. The application of the framework is demonstrated in a case study project. The research contributes new knowledge in evaluation of public projects across planning, business, and construction management literature.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | infrastructure projects; public participation; social network theory; social value creation |
| Index terms: | value creation, stakeholder network, public project, public participation, public infrastructure, social network theory, case study, satisfaction, social performance, social value, infrastructure planning, infrastructure project |
| Subjects: | sociology, infrastructure and transport systems, economic development, infrastructure engineering, strategic project management, project delivery, participation process, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here