Elmousalami, H H; Elyamany, A H and Ibrahim, A H (2018) Predicting conceptual cost for field canal improvement projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(11): 04018102, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
A conceptual cost estimation is prepared to assess the feasibility of a project or establish the project's initial budget at the early stages of the project. The main objective of the paper is automating the cost estimate at the conceptual stage with the highest accuracy. The key contribution of this paper is developing a quadratic regression model with a prediction accuracy of 9.12% and 7.82% for training and validation, respectively. This research has identified the model's key parameters to establish a reliable conceptual cost estimate model for field canal improvement projects (FCIPs). Two machine learning models were developed utilizing multiple regression analysis (MRA) and artificial neural networks (ANNs). Searching for a better model, several data transformations have been conducted to improve the model performance. The quadratic regression model has shown the highest performance based on the correlation and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) criteria. A parametric model has been presented in this paper to predict the conceptual cost of FCIPs. This research maintains the importance of identifying key parameters and conducting data transformation and sensitivity analysis for developing a reliable parametric cost prediction model.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial neural networks; conceptual construction cost; field canal improvement projects; key parameters selection; machine learning; multiple regression analysis; parametric model |
| Index terms: | cost prediction, regression model, transformation, construction cost, cost estimate, sensitivity analysis, cost estimating, canal, accuracy, artificial neural network, improvement project, validation, performance-based, machine learning, multiple regression analysis |
| Subjects: | modelling and simulation, financial and cost management, artificial intelligence, business, environmental hazards, statistical analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, performance measurement, professional development, production management |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Quality Management, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here