Performance-based maintenance contracting in Florida: Evaluation by surveys, statistics, and content analysis

Fuller, J; Brown, C J and Crowley, R (2018) Performance-based maintenance contracting in Florida: Evaluation by surveys, statistics, and content analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(2): 05017021, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

In recent years, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) adopted a form of performance-based maintenance contracting (PBMC) that it calls the asset maintenance contracting (AMC) program. This case study presents an analysis of the AMC program in Florida using a survey, an interview, and content analysis. Although similar studies have been conducted in the past, the survey presented here is unique in that the opinions of contractors and lower-level state employees were solicited. The results indicated that contractors were more confident in the success of the AMC program than were the state employees in Florida and that the cost and performance data needed to be maintained for quantitative analysis. The results highlighted the need for partnering between state agencies and contractors, emphasized the need for a shared-risk model, and stressed the importance of a well-defined scope and of quantifiable performance measures. The unique work associated with this paper included the use of contractors and lower-level employees in the survey and the use of content analysis to examine the interview responses. This was the first study of its kind conducted in Florida.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: asset maintenance; contracting; highway maintenance; performance-based contracting; performance-based maintenance contracting
Index terms: statistics, partnering, case study, quantitative analysis, agency, performance-based, program, performance measure, content analysis, survey, interview
Subjects: data collection methods, mathematical modelling, data analysis and analytics, performance measurement, software systems, partnership management, sociology
Topics: Digital Applications, Quality Management, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here