Dynamic modeling of multifactor construction productivity for equipment-intensive activities

Gerami Seresht, N and Fayek, A R (2018) Dynamic modeling of multifactor construction productivity for equipment-intensive activities. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(9): 04018091, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Construction productivity is a major research interest within the construction domain. Because construction is a labor-intensive industry, previous research has often focused on construction labor productivity (CLP). However, equipment is the main driver of productivity for some construction activities, so-called equipment-intensive activities. Existing models of activity-level productivity often predict a single-factor productivity measure - namely CLP - yet determining multifactor productivity, including labor, material, and equipment, provides more comprehensive predictions of productivity. Construction productivity models are often static in nature, or incapable of capturing the subjective uncertainty of some factors influencing productivity. Fuzzy system dynamics is an appropriate technique for modeling construction productivity because it captures the dynamism of construction projects and addresses the subjective and probabilistic uncertainty of factors influencing productivity. The contributions of this paper are threefold: identifying the key factors influencing the productivity of equipment-intensive activities, developing a predictive model of multifactor productivity for equipment-intensive activities using fuzzy system dynamics technique, and developing an approach to reduce uncertainty overestimation in the simulation results of fuzzy system dynamics models.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction equipment; construction productivity; fuzzy logic; system dynamics
Index terms: construction labour, modelling, construction productivity, construction equipment, fuzzy logic, construction activity, productivity, system dynamics, construction project, dynamic modelling
Subjects: management, construction equipment, production management, computing systems, modelling and simulation, operations management, analytical methods, construction operations, data science
Topics: Project Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Plant and Equipment, Digital Applications, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here