Hammad, M W; Abbasi, A and Ryan, M J (2018) Developing a novel framework to manage schedule contingency using theory of constraints and earned schedule method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(4): 04018011, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
In this paper, a novel framework is presented for estimating, allocating, and managing schedule contingency using the theory of constraints and the earned schedule technique. The main aim of the proposed framework is to present a practical technique to manage schedule contingency in a manner that is easy to use and simple to understand; can overcome the drawbacks of earned value management for the schedule component; can overcome the inaccuracy caused by using critical path method; and takes into account the statistical nature of each activity and merges them to form a single framework. The framework introduces two new measures, buffer performance index and buffer variance, for measuring the expected remaining buffer and the actual remaining buffer on critical and noncritical chains based on the percentage completion for each activity at the end of the reporting period, respectively. To verify the proposed framework, the processes and measures have been applied to three projects, each with different complexities. The results show potential for managing buffers when placed at the project level, without the involvement of complex mathematical models or tedious equations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buffer management; earned schedule; earned value; Monte Carlo simulation; project control; project management; schedule management; schedule uncertainty; theory of constraints |
| Index terms: | mathematical model, earned value management, complexity, estimating, critical path method, variance, Monte Carlo simulation, buffer, theory of constraints, project management, project control |
| Subjects: | financial risk, project management theory and practice, systems engineering, measurement and scaling, control systems, mathematical modelling, financial and cost management, operations research, modelling and simulation |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here