Han, Y; Li, Y; Taylor, J E and Zhong, J (2018) Characteristics and evolution of innovative collaboration networks in architecture, engineering, and construction: Study of national prize-winning projects in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(6): 04018038, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
As the scale and complexity of capital projects continue to increase, so do collaboration requirements among owners, engineers, architects, contractors, and other stakeholders in the project lifecycle. These organizational network challenges can impede successful project delivery. Innovation is a key factor in executing complex projects that require expertise from each party in a collaboration network. Unlike in many other industries, collaborations in architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) project networks are typically temporary and require periods of intense collaboration. In an effort to understand the characteristics and evolutionary paths of innovative collaboration networks in the AEC industry, the authors collected data on more than 200 projects over a 15-year period (2000-2014) that were awarded the State Science and Technology Advancement Prize (SSTAP) of China and examine each of these as innovation collaboration cases. Social network analysis (SNA) techniques are used to understand the network characteristics and to examine the evolutionary patterns over time. The results find the studied innovative collaboration networks to be large and interwoven. Universities, with significantly greater betweenness centralities, serve as key network nodes in spreading creativity and promoting practical-theoretical integrations. This study also reveals that fewer repeated collaborations lead to more innovativeness. In other words, repeated collaborations may have a negative impact on novel and challenging AEC projects. Understanding such characteristics could promote innovations in the AEC industry and aid in the selection of strategic partners to participate in the execution of large and complex AEC projects more efficiently and effectively.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architecture, engineering, and construction projects; collaboration; innovation; megaprojects; networks |
| Index terms: | engineer, owner, project lifecycle, creativity, complex project, project delivery, capital project, architect, science, social network analysis, project network, China, complexity, megaproject, evolution, integration, collaboration, construction project |
| Subjects: | specialized education, project completion, profession, project delivery, strategic project management, environmental science, project planning, Geography, production management, research methods, management, systems engineering, innovation and creative processes, sociology, organizational analysis |
| Topics: | Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Sustainability, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here