Hosseini, M R; Martek, I; Chileshe, N; Zavadskas, E K and Arashpour, M (2018) Assessing the influence of virtuality on the effectiveness of engineering project networks: "Big five theory" perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(7): 04018059, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Engineering project networks (EPNs), as digitally mediated units whose team members are scattered across different organizations/locations, have become the norm for construction project teams. In EPNs, virtuality captures various forms of boundaries among team members and influences major dimensions of team functioning and outcomes. Despite this importance, investigating the role of virtuality on the functional performance of EPNs has remained an unexplored area. Through a multidisciplinary review of literature, a theoretical model has been created to conceptualize the fabric of links between virtuality and effectiveness in EPNs. The theoretical basis of the model is the Big Five theory of team effectiveness. The model has been evaluated using empirical data collected from 285 completed questionnaires, and analyzed through the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) technique. Quantification of associations reveals that virtuality significantly affects effectiveness in teams by manipulating several mediators. However, the level of influence of virtuality on these mediators, and eventually effectiveness, is much lower than previously assumed by current literature. This study goes beyond existing studies, presenting the first quantified model of virtuality applicable to any type of EPN in the construction context.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | big five theory; construction projects; effectiveness; engineering project networks; virtual teams; virtuality |
| Index terms: | dimension, effectiveness, quantification, mediator, construction project team, virtual team, partial least square, team effectiveness, boundaries, construction project, questionnaire, structural equation modelling, engineering project network, virtuality |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, dispute resolution, health monitoring assessment and metrics, project delivery, property law, project planning, performance management, management, production management, measurement and scaling, statistical analysis, information systems |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here