Hu, C and Liu, D (2018) Improved critical path method with trapezoidal fuzzy activity durations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(9): 04018090, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The critical path method is an essential tool for project planning, control, and scheduling. But when it is applied to analyze the critical path of project networks with fuzzy activity durations, two key issues need to be settled properly: sorting fuzzy numbers and avoiding the fuzzy subtraction operation to generate negative, infeasible solutions. In view of this, this study proposes an improved fuzzy critical path method. The primary contributions this research makes to the body of knowledge are as follows: an integrated vector similarity algorithm is used to resolve the sorting problem of fuzzy durations, while the improved standard algorithm for fuzzy subtraction is to circumvent the negative, infeasible solutions generated in fuzzy subtraction operation; moreover, this method analyzes and depicts the change of critical path under the fuzzy state of activity duration, which fills the knowledge gaps. The empirical analysis indicates that the inference and computation of this method are relatively objective and easy to implement, the effectiveness and practicability of which are further verified in practice.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | activity duration; critical path method; improved standard algorithm for fuzzy subtraction; integrated vector similarity; trapezoid fuzzy number |
| Index terms: | critical path, duration, critical path method, project network, effectiveness, body of knowledge, computation, project planning, scheduling |
| Subjects: | performance management, project planning, computational methods, operations research, project controls, control systems, knowledge management |
| Topics: | Time Control, Information Management, Quality Management, Project Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here