Are visual search patterns predictive of hazard recognition performance? Empirical investigation using eye-tracking technology

Jeelani, I; Albert, A; Han, K and Azevedo, R (2018) Are visual search patterns predictive of hazard recognition performance? Empirical investigation using eye-tracking technology. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(1): 04018115, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Poor hazard recognition is a widespread issue in the construction industry. When construction hazards remain unrecognized, workers are more likely to indulge in unsafe behavior, experience unanticipated hazard exposure, and suffer catastrophic injuries. To improve our understanding of why construction hazards remain unrecognized, the current study examined hazard recognition as an everyday visual search task - similar to an individual searching for a product in a supermarket, a radiologist examining a radiograph for tissue abnormalities, or a security personnel screening baggage at an airport terminal. More specifically, the research used eye-tracking technology to examine the relationship between visual search patterns adopted by workers while participating in a hazard recognition activity and the resulting performance levels (i.e., hazard recognition performance). The research also focused on testing the effects of introducing a recently developed personalized training intervention on visual search patterns adopted by workers - and the subsequent hazard recognition performance. Visual search patterns examined in the study included search duration, fixation count, fixation spatial density, and others identified from past research. The results reveal that several quantifiable visual search patterns are predictive of superior hazard recognition performance. For example, workers who spent more time examining the workplace for safety hazards (i.e., search duration) recognized a larger proportion of hazards. Likewise, workers that devoted higher levels of attention through a larger number of fixations (i.e., fixation count) and longer fixation durations (i.e., fixation time), and those that distributed their visual attention more broadly across the work area (i.e., fixation spatial density), demonstrated superior performance. The findings also suggest that the adoption of the personalized intervention can lead to improvements in visual search patterns and hazard recognition performance among workers. The present research will be useful to diagnose and remedy search weaknesses demonstrated by workers (i.e., human factors) that are associated with poor hazard recognition levels.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction safety; eye-tracking; hazard identification; hazard recognition; human factors; occupational safety; personalized training; safety training; visual search
Index terms: investigation, occupational safety, safety training, duration, construction industry, testing, density, screening, hazard identification, exposure, construction safety, human factor, personnel, unsafe behaviour, injury
Subjects: professional practice, analytical methods, data collection methods, industry analysis, environmental health, occupational health and safety management, project controls, health conditions and diseases, financial risk, management, public and environmental health
Topics: Time Control, Urban Studies, Human Resources, Sustainability, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here