Data-driven simulation model for quality-induced rework cost estimation and control using absorbing Markov chains

Ji, W and Abourizk, S M (2018) Data-driven simulation model for quality-induced rework cost estimation and control using absorbing Markov chains. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(8): 04018078, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

This paper aims to develop a novel, data-driven simulation model to quantitatively assist decision support systems in quality-induced rework cost estimation and control for construction product fabrication. At the core of the model is a specialized absorbing Markov chain, which stochastically models the construction product fabrication process while considering quality-induced rework uncertainty. The model parameters are dynamically updated using real-time quality management and cost management information to achieve more accurate and reliable simulation outputs. Furthermore, two types of decision-support metrics are developed to support rework cost management processes, namely (1) rework cost estimation during the project planning phase, and (2) rework cost control during the project execution phase. An illustrative example is provided to demonstrate the functionalities of the model and the implementation of the decision-support metrics. Finally, the proposed approach is integrated into the previously developed simulation-based analytics framework and implemented by an industrial pipe fabrication company in Edmonton, Canada. The presented case study demonstrates the applicability and feasibility of the proposed approach to industrial pipe welding processes.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: absorbing Markov chain; cost estimation and control; data-driven simulation; pipe fabrication; rework
Index terms: Markov chain, case study, Canada, cost management, fabrication, quality management, implementation, decision support, cost estimating, functionality, rework, cost control, project planning, construction product
Subjects: contractual arrangements, economic analysis, financial and cost management, design features, operations management, control systems, data collection methods, mathematical modelling, quality assurance, decision analysis, Geography, manufacturing engineering, accounting and finance
Topics: Quality Management, Design Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Procurement, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here