Kosonen, H K and Kim, A A (2018) Mental model approach to wastewater treatment plant project delivery during emergency response. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(6): 05018005, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The proper management of water sanitation and hygiene (WASH) services is critical in serving displaced populations. In 2015, the Azraq refugee camp in Jordan serving the displaced Syrian populations became one of the first in the world to have an on-site advanced wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Although there exist guidelines and best practices on the proper WWTP incident management, evidence suggests that they are largely ineffective in providing substantial benefits to active incident management. This study applied a mental model approach to investigate the Azraq WWTP project stakeholder decision practices during an active incident management phase and to initiate work to identify the factors that influence the WWTP project delivery during a disaster response. These findings showed that improving the practitioners' ability to recognize and address the nontechnical internal concepts that impact their decision processes could positively influence the wastewater treatment plant construction and operation in new and challenging project conditions. The implementable recommendations include flat communication structures, training for locating knowledge within new disaster response project groups, and increasing the stakeholders' ability to create improvised solutions on the basis of their existing professional knowledge.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision making; disaster response; project delivery; risk communications; wastewater treatment; water sanitation and hygiene |
| Index terms: | evidence, practitioner, project stakeholder, population, decision-making, sanitation, emergency response, refugee, best practice, project delivery, Jordan, disaster response, decision process, professional knowledge, mental model |
| Subjects: | project delivery, evaluation and assessment methods, business, practitioner, demography, sociology, decision analysis, emergency and crisis management, cognitive psychology, environmental health, safety engineering, Geography, professional development |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Sustainability, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here