Kwon, N; Song, K; Lee, H S; Kim, J and Park, M (2018) Construction noise risk assessment model focusing on construction equipment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(6): 04018034, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Environmental issues are becoming a growing concern for the construction sector and cause a number of complaints. Construction noise is one of the most prevalent stressors to the public, especially for residents near worksites. Many academic and practical studies have been conducted to address such noise-related problems. However, conventional approaches typically focus on monitoring noise and experts' judgment; they are limited at evaluating the degree of risk caused by noise. This paper proposes a model for determining the noise-induced risk, with the severity based on the predicted noise level from a Monte Carlo simulation and the occurrence probability of the noise exceeding a certain limit. Case studies were conducted to confirm the applicability of the model. The results indicate the crucial period that needs to be carefully managed, which is more applicable to determining the noise-induced risk compared to existing approaches. This paper contributes to the literature for noise management by presenting a method for evaluating the impact of noise-related risk and providing a pragmatic alternative to supplement existing approaches during the preconstruction phase.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | conflict and dispute; construction noise; noise management; noise-induced risk; risk assessment |
| Index terms: | stressors, environmental issue, complaint, construction sector, becoming, judgment, case study, construction equipment, Monte Carlo simulation, dispute, construction noise, risk assessment, monitoring |
| Subjects: | control systems, dispute resolution, environmental impact, environmental issues, data collection methods, modelling and simulation, construction equipment, financial risk, philosophical process, industry analysis, health conditions and diseases, conflict resolution |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Site Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Sustainability, Plant and Equipment, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here