Enhancing BIM performance in EPC projects through integrative trust-based functional contracting model

Lee, C Y; Chong, H Y and Wang, X (2018) Enhancing BIM performance in EPC projects through integrative trust-based functional contracting model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(7): 06018002, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Delivering building information modeling (BIM) requires a certain level of trust to make it more effective. However, the engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) approach, which conventionally adopts transaction law, encourages each party to protect their legitimate interest. Consequently, EPC contracting parties operate within their own goals and procedures, in which trust is not a fundamental contracting strategy. In addition, distrust - which is commonly perceived as detrimental to the relationship - should receive more attention when examining the beneficial outcomes of the relationship. Contract research has emerged from focusing on the safeguarding of contract transactions and is currently moving toward coordination and contingency adaptability for its success. In this context, this paper proposes an integrative trust-based functional contracting model that describes how trust can enhance BIM performance in EPC projects. Thus, this paper contributes new knowledge of the proper use and harmonization of contract functions and provides significant insight for the construction industry to think beyond the traditional EPC contract setting for effective use of BIM.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building information modeling; contract functions; distrust model; engineering, procurement, and construction; trust model
Index terms: strategy, adaptability, trust model, contracting party, building information modelling, construction industry, coordination
Subjects: industry analysis, information systems, management, psychology, practitioner, user focus
Topics: Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here