Value engineering for defect prevention on building façade

Lee, J S (2018) Value engineering for defect prevention on building façade. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(8): 04018069, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

A building façade is affected by the environment as well as the physical performances of the building-materials at every stage of the building's life cycle. Although a number of studies have been conducted to overcome the nonsustainable conditions of building façade, they mostly focus on cost-based design. Accordingly, previous studies did not incorporate critical issues such as the durability of building façade at the design stage; therefore, a process for the selection of optimal façade materials is needed, with a particular consideration of durability, as well as the functional and economic performances of the materials. The aim of this study is therefore the development of the corresponding decision-making process for the selection of façade materials to minimize the potential defects at the design stage. The case study reveals that the priority of the material options for building façade can be changed if minimum 30% weighting of the durability for each option is reflected on the decision-making process. The research contribution here is the incorporation of a value-based decision-making process during the selection of optimal façade materials for sustainability.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: defects; façade materials; sustainability; value engineering
Index terms: life cycle, prevention, case study, value-based decision, critical issue, durability, option, design stage, value engineering, decision-making process
Subjects: decision analysis, professional practice, material degradation and durability, financial risk, value management, data collection methods, tendering, risk assessment
Topics: Construction Materials, Design Practice, Project Management, Cost Management, Procurement, Research Practice, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here