Temporal effect of construction workforce physical strain on diminishing marginal productivity at the task level

Lee, W and Migliaccio, G C (2018) Temporal effect of construction workforce physical strain on diminishing marginal productivity at the task level. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(9): 04018083, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Physiological status and environmental stressors are known to influence workforce performance at the individual worker level. A previous study, which conducted a cross-sectional comparison in repetitive material-handling construction activities, suggested that a U-shaped relationship existed between physical strain and productivity at the group level. This research revisits those findings to further investigate the U-curve relationship between physical strain and productivity at the group level and validate the concept of diminishing marginal productivity. Heart rates were measured as an indicator of subjects' physical strain, whereas task productivity was estimated by work sampling. Eighty person-hour data were converted into panel data sets by dividing each subject's 4-h experimental data into 5-min intervals. These data sets were subsequently used to evaluate the effects of time on physical strain and productivity with 5-min lags. The study found a U-curve relationship between physical strain and task-level productivity at the group level while controlling for individual characteristics. The U-shape relationship was constant in the low-performance and high-performance groups, although the degrees of the polynomials differed. Productive workers will remain more productive than low-productive workers with increased physical strain.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction productivity; diminishing marginal productivity; labor and personal issue; physical strain; work physiology
Index terms: construction activity, work physiology, productivity, construction productivity, sampling, stressors, heart
Subjects: occupational health, health conditions and diseases, medical science and clinical practice, operations management, management, construction operations, data collection methods
Topics: Project Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here