Development of data-driven influence model to relate the workplace environment to human error

Liao, P C; Shi, H; Su, Y and Luo, X (2018) Development of data-driven influence model to relate the workplace environment to human error. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(3): 04018003, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Because human error plays a direct role in accidents, studying the causal relationship between the environment and human error is essential to prevent mishaps. However, these relationships have been explored solely using bivariate statistical analysis and thus require more intermediate factors to emphasize the need for monitoring and controlling human error by improving the workplace environment. Moreover, prevalent studies rely heavily on expert experience, which is subjective and creates potential estimation noise. In this study, the mechanism whereby environmental factors influence behavior and its associate factors is learned with an algorithm using a Bayesian network structure. Rather than being simply data-driven, the algorithm initiates learning from prior knowledge, the theoretical causal chain in the cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM), and revises the learning approach against safety inspection data if necessary. The learned Bayesian network shows that human error and incorrect sequencing result from a combination of limited cognitive functions and improper spatial/workmanship arrangements caused by equipment defects, improper design, and management problems. Bridging the gaps in previous studies, the action interface revealed by this study is useful for on-site quality control.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Bayesian network; construction safety; human error; labor and personnel issues; structured learning
Index terms: construction safety, monitoring, statistical analysis, workplace environment, safety inspection, estimation, personnel, workmanship, environmental factor, bayesian network, quality control
Subjects: control systems, quality assurance, sociology, environmental science, contractual condition, data science, environmental health, probabilistic model, financial and cost management, management, project delivery
Topics: Quality Management, Cost Management, Digital Applications, Site Management, Research Practice, Contract Administration, Organizational Design, Human Resources, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here