Liu, X; Song, Y; Yi, W; Wang, X and Zhu, J (2018) Comparing the random forest with the generalized additive model to evaluate the impacts of outdoor ambient environmental factors on scaffolding construction productivity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(6): 04018037, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The improvement of construction productivity has always been a key concern for both researchers and project managers. Several studies have analyzed construction productivity from different perspectives; however, little research has been conducted to evaluate the impact of outdoor ambient environmental factors on construction productivity, especially at the project level. Therefore, to assess such impacts, a nonparametric regression model - the generalized additive model (GAM) - and a nonlinear machine learning model - random forest (RF) - are comparatively used to assess these contributors on the scaffolding construction performance factor (PF). The meteorological variables used in this study include temperature, humidity, ambient pressure, wind speed and wind direction, specific weather event (clear day, fog, rain, or thunderstorm), and the ultraviolet (UV) index. Results demonstrate that the joint meteorological factors play a key role in construction PF variation, with contribution ranging from 32.50% (GAM) to 59.41% (RF). The better performance of RF and GAM shows that the relationship between outdoor ambient environment and construction productivity is nonlinear and should be built by nonlinear models.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | environmental factor, machine learning, weather, variation, scaffolding, forest, wind speed, humidity, construction productivity, rain, construction performance, regression model, project manager |
| Subjects: | operations management, artificial intelligence, performance assessment, environmental science, profession, air quality, climate science, statistical analysis, contractual condition |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Contract Administration, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Sustainability, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here