Nguyen, P H D; Lines, B C and Tran, D Q (2018) Best-value procurement in design-bid-build construction projects: Empirical analysis of selection outcomes. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(10): 04018093, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Best-value (BV) procurement is increasingly used in conventional design-bid-build (DBB) delivery, which raises questions regarding the influence of qualifications-based evaluation criteria when selecting construction contractors. The objectives of this study are to (1) examine BV procurement outcomes that can be expected from DBB projects, (2) determine which evaluation criteria have the greatest dispersion among competing contractors, and (3) identify whether a relationship exists between cost- and qualifications-based proposal submissions. A sample of 162 public institutional BV-procured DBB projects was collected that include evaluation results of 684 contractor proposals. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used, including coefficient of variation and correlation analysis of evaluation criteria. The results show that BV-selected contractors offer substantial qualifications benefits in comparison with lowest- and average-bidder alternatives. Certain qualifications-based criteria, such as technical proposals, contractor interview scores, and safety proposals were found to have a greater dispersion among competing bidders than cost proposals. Contributions of this study to the body of knowledge include a sizable empirical data set of BV-procured DBB projects in the vertical sector and a unit of measure that considers dispersion among competing contractor proposals. In current construction industry practice, it is recommended that project owners consider BV for complex DBB projects and prioritize certain qualifications-based criteria that are well-suited for differentiating between competing contractor proposals.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | best-value procurement; bidding cost; coefficient of variation; design-bid-build; Kruskal-Wallis h test; qualifications-based evaluation criteria |
| Index terms: | proposal, interview, body of knowledge, construction contractor, bidding, construction industry practice, variation, construction project, owner, correlation analysis, design-bid-build, qualification, statistics, bidder |
| Subjects: | management, educational resources, contractual condition, production management, sociology, statistical analysis, data collection methods, mathematical modelling, practitioner, project planning, contractual arrangements, knowledge management, bidding |
| Topics: | Education, Contract Administration, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here