Novel precast erection method of interlocking mechanical joints using couplers

Nzabonimpa, J D and Hong, W K (2018) Novel precast erection method of interlocking mechanical joints using couplers. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(6): 04018036, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Despite many advantages of precast concrete members, the conventional precast members lack in the treatment of construction waste, require concrete pour forms at joints, and their structural discontinuity leads to low redundancy in the load paths. This study aims to provide novel solutions to these problems by developing interlocking mechanical joints with fully restrained moments for the connections of both steel-concrete composite precast and reinforced concrete precast columns. In the proposed connections, a pair of steel plates was provided; each plate was installed at the bottom of the upper columns and on top of the lower columns, which were then connected monolithically via vertical column rebars passing through the metal plates, providing flexural capacity similar to that of conventional monolithic column connections. The column rebars were spliced by couplers that were manufactured to be fastened by the weight of the upper column, which was heavy enough to push the vertical rebars into the couplers in the area prepared at the lower part of the upper column, providing a monolithic joint for the connected precast columns. Throughout the erection test, it was found that conventional monolithic cast-in-place joints for assembling precast concrete frames can be replaced by the interlocking mechanical joints, offering rapid erection compared with traditional practices. The columns with proposed joints were also proved to demonstrate sufficient structural capacity. Stresses and strains were found within allowable limits on the basis of finite-element analysis considering concrete plasticity during the assembly of heavy precast frames. The erection test showed sufficient verticality ensuring rebars to be connected via couplers when the upper columns were released down to the lower columns. This novel frame did not require concrete cast at the joint, eliminating the use of concrete pour forms adopted in conventional construction methods over the last years. Effortless erection with structural efficiency was demonstrated by using the proposed assembly method, with a significant reduction in the time required to assemble precast frames, similar to that of steel frames. The novel frames proposed in this study are expected to replace the conventional concrete frames including cast-in-place frames and precast frames with traditional joints. These novel frames contribute to the concrete industry by providing rapid and dependable construction of both precast and cast-in place frames.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: column-column joint; couplers; erection method using interlocking mechanical joints; erection of precast frames; fully restrained moment; precast columns connected with metal plates; precast concrete frames
Index terms: reinforced concrete, steel frame, steel plate, construction method, column, redundancy, precast concrete, rebar, construction waste, metal, composite, efficiency, concrete industry
Subjects: materials science, waste management, building materials, performance management, traditional and composite building materials, structural engineering, management, building construction, industry analysis
Topics: Site Management, Quality Management, Human Resources, Sustainability, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here