Rashid, K M and Behzadan, A H (2018) Risk behavior-based trajectory prediction for construction site safety monitoring. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(2): 04017106, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Construction sites are often described as some of the most hazardous work environments due to the unscripted nature of tasks which puts workers and equipment in close proximity, potentially resulting in near-miss situations or life-threatening contact collisions. Previous research has investigated location-aware methods to improve construction safety but has mostly fallen short in exploring the extent to which prediction techniques can be used to model and formulate the role and attributes of individual workers in addition to the physical characteristics of the jobsite that may lead to safety incidents. This paper studies the feasibility of a preemptive proximity-based safety framework by investigating two trajectory prediction models, namely polynomial regression (PR) and hidden Markov model (HMM). The HMM prediction is further calibrated by factoring in a worker's risk profile, which is a measure of his or her affinity for or aversion to risky behavior near hazards. The method is tested in a series of field experiments involving trajectories of different shapes and complexity. Results demonstrate that the developed methodology can reliably detect unsafe movements and impending collision events.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction safety; global positioning system; Markov model; quantitative methods; real-time tracking; risk attitude; trajectory prediction |
| Index terms: | work environment, monitoring, real-time tracking, quantitative method, risk behaviour, methodology, physical characteristic, complexity, construction safety, movement, risk attitude, experiment, prediction model, construction site |
| Subjects: | work location, data analysis and analytics, prediction and forecasting, data collection methods, control systems, health behaviours and lifestyles, data management, environmental health, systems engineering, management, research methods, decision-making and reasoning, material properties and characteristics |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Site Management, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here