Rocha, C G D; Anzanello, M J and Gerchman, M (2018) Method to assess the match between clients' input and decoupling points in customized building projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(5): 04018018, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Clients' input (i.e., design drawings and specifications containing clients' desired changes) is a key resource for task completion often missing in customized building projects, leading to waste such as additional movement, increase in work in progress, rework, stoppages, and delays. Such waste can be potentially reduced by postponing the moment in which such input is first needed [i.e., the decoupling point (DP)]. This paper proposes a simulation-based method to quantify the probability of having clients' input according to production plans using the line-of-balance technique. The method is applied to two sets of plans to assess the effect of four variables (cycle time, batch size, work structure, and construction start time) on such probabilities. Work structure and construction start time were found to be the main variables affecting such probabilities. Nonetheless, preliminary results (considering a uniform probability distribution for clients' input) indicate a minimal probability of having clients' input according to production plans even for the most favorable plan (late construction start, DP in the last work package, short cycle time, and large batch size). This means that altering these variables is not sufficient to ensure the availability of clients' input and other approaches are needed to support a good flow.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | customization; flow; house building; line of balance; simulation |
| Index terms: | design drawing, line of balance, rework, package, probability distribution, decoupling, movement, customization, specification |
| Subjects: | technical documentation, systems engineering, operations research, contractual arrangements, operations management, statistical analysis, construction manufacturing, contractual condition, health behaviours and lifestyles |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Procurement, Time Control, Business Strategy, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here