Said, H M and Bartusiak, J (2018) Regional competition analysis of industrialized homebuilding industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(2): 04017108, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Industrialized homebuilding (IHB) has been suggested as the solution to the housing crisis around the world. However, there is no clear understanding of the potential impacts of industrialization on the competition structure and dynamics of the homebuilding industry. As such, this study assesses the regional competition dynamics in industrialized homebuilding environment, especially between local and nonlocal home manufacturers of a large regional housing market. The study adopted a bottom-up market competition analysis methodology that involved data collection, market entry/exit analysis, and manufacturer survival analysis. An extensive detailed data sample of home ownership was acquired for manufactured housing in Texas, which was processed to generate the manufacturer data and their time series. The study found that manufacturers from out of state have less market power, illustrated by their smaller concentration, higher exit rate, lower market share, smaller relative sizes, and shorter survival periods than those of nonlocal manufacturers. The main contribution of this study is assessing the competition imbalance of the industrialized IHB industry using representative competition metrics that were derived from a large, detailed sample of home manufacturers.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competition; industrialization; manufactured housing; quantitative methods; survival |
| Index terms: | quantitative method, competition, methodology, housing, time series, manufacturer, industrialization, ownership, dynamics, survival, market entry, market share |
| Subjects: | systems engineering, market analysis, economic development, research methods, economics, data science, data analysis and analytics, environmental science, practitioner, construction type, business |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here