Chaos theory-inspired evolutionary method to refine imperfect sensor data for data-driven construction simulation

Shrestha, P and Behzadan, A H (2018) Chaos theory-inspired evolutionary method to refine imperfect sensor data for data-driven construction simulation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(3): 04018001, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

In construction planning, inherent uncertainties in activity sequences and variations of work packages can often cause deviations from project plans. In order to effectively study and preempt scenarios that may lead to undesired project time and cost overruns, several construction domain-specific simulation platforms have been designed and introduced in the past. Although transitioning to simulation-based decision-making has great potential to streamline project conceptualization and early planning, the inability of simulations to evolve with the real system can significantly limit their applicability and render them unreliable for construction-phase decision-making. This issue has been identified as one of the grand challenges to industry-wide adoption of simulation models throughout the lifecycle of construction and infrastructure projects. A potential solution to this problem is to equip simulations with sensing systems that interact with and collect project data in runtime. This approach, however, requires meticulous effort to procure, set up, operate, synchronize, calibrate, and maintain sensing devices over a large project area. This practical challenge can potentially hinder the ability of simulation systems to adapt and remain relevant for decision-making. Moreover, sensor readings are often noisy and imperfect. If used as inputs to a simulation model, this noise in sensor data can create volatility in simulation outputs. Chaos theory describes how small variations in input can cause high output errors even in simple systems. To this end, this paper presents an evolutionary algorithm to process and significantly reduce noise in imperfect sensor data captured by low-cost consumer-grade sensors. The main contribution of this work to the body of knowledge is a scientific methodology of refining imperfect (noisy) sensor data and producing clean datasets that can be used to generate more stable simulation input models. This methodology was validated in a field experiment in which simulation models were created using noisy (imperfect) as well as refined sensor data. The output of each simulation model was compared with ground truth values. Analysis of results shows that using refined sensor data to generate simulation models significantly improves the accuracy and reliability of the simulation output.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: activity sequence; chaos theory; construction simulation; fuzzy data; genetic algorithm; quantitative methods; sensor networks
Index terms: dataset, body of knowledge, quantitative method, decision-making, activity sequence, methodology, variation, experiment, accuracy, project data, construction simulation, genetic algorithm, sensor data, chaos theory, construction planning, infrastructure project, lifecycle, cost overrun, deviation, evolutionary algorithm, platform, package
Subjects: research products and data, modelling and simulation, operations research, data analysis and analytics, knowledge management, contractual arrangements, project delivery, financial and cost management, construction planning, data collection methods, mathematical modelling, data management, decision analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, algorithms, research methods, contractual condition, professional development, digital design
Topics: Digital Applications, Time Control, Contract Administration, Site Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Procurement, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here