Work values across generations among construction professionals in the United States

Simmons, D R; Iorio, J; Taylor, J E and Li, D (2018) Work values across generations among construction professionals in the United States. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(10): 04018096, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Employees hold a range of attitudes and beliefs about their work life. This paper's contribution to the overall body of knowledge is to further the understanding of how construction professionals' work values are influenced by generational status. Improved understanding of the relationship between work values and generations can inform construction companies' support for current employees and recruitment of new employees. This study collected survey data to investigate the work values of construction professionals. The data were explored to examine similarities and differences in responses based on membership in a specific generation (e.g., baby boomer or Generation Xer). Prior research regarding work values and generational status presents mixed findings, with some studies reporting differences and others finding no differences among generations. Analysis of this survey data revealed very few differences among generations, suggesting that construction companies adapting practices based solely on generational status may be doing so to their detriment. The results contribute to the growing body of research that explores generational differences in work values.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: survey, construction company, United States, body of knowledge, construction professional, recruitment
Subjects: professional development, knowledge management, organization, management, data collection methods, Geography
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Human Resources, Geographical Context, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here