Measuring and predicting fatigue in construction: Empirical field study

Techera, U; Hallowell, M; Littlejohn, R and Rajendran, S (2018) Measuring and predicting fatigue in construction: Empirical field study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(8): 04018062, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The increasing commitment to safety over the last two decades has contributed to a 67% decline in recordable incident rates. The rate of fatalities, however, has recently increased. Human factors, like fatigue, strongly relate to fatalities. The prediction of fatigue would allow for an early intervention, thus mitigating safety risk. The literature suggests several potential predictors of fatigue onset; however, each of these was mainly studied in isolation, in laboratory settings, and their predictive validity in the construction industry remains unknown. The authors hypothesized that a set of measurable factors can predict construction worker fatigue. A field study of 252 US construction workers was conducted in which potential predictors and fatigue levels were assessed, and the first fatigue predictive models for construction workers were created. The models presented low to medium predictivity, demonstrating that laboratory research and results obtained from other occupations do not directly apply to the construction industry. Furthermore, fatigue predictive models showed to differ among trades. These models will serve the industry to better manage fatigue; however, further research in this area is needed.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: validity, construction worker, fatalities, construction industry, occupation, commitment, fatigue, field study, laboratory, human factor
Subjects: psychology, evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner, sociology, research management, health conditions and diseases, occupational health and safety management, industry analysis, research methods, health risk and incident analysis
Topics: Research Practice, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here