Alruwaythi, O and Goodrum, P (2019) A difference in perspective: Impact of different formats of engineering information and spatial cognition on craft-worker eye-gaze patterns. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(11): 04019065, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Individuals vary widely in their ability to translate complex spatial information into performing physical tasks. Much of the variability can be explained by their experience in using different information formats and differences in individual spatial cognition. Traditional delivery of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) designs rely on two-dimensional isometric drawings. Advancements in three-dimensional (3D) computer-aided design (CAD), augmented reality, virtual reality, and 3D printing have provided new format options for delivering engineering information; however, providing them to crafts for use at the construction workface remains relatively rare. The objective of this research is to understand how eye-gaze patterns of construction craft workers is influenced by information formats and spatial cognition when building a complex spatial task. A series of field trials with MEP workers was conducted to examine the influence of information format and spatial cognition on their eye-gaze patterns in building a scale-model pipe assembly. Participants were provided eye-tracking glasses along with one of three information formats: Two-dimensional (2D) isometric drawings, 2D isometric drawings supplemented with a 3D image of the assembly, and 2D isometric drawings supplemented with a 3D physical model of the assembly. Card rotation and cube comparison tests were administered to measure spatial cognition. The results of this paper reveal that the information format and spatial cognition significantly influenced workers' eye-gaze patterns; there are different gaze patterns for different information formats, and these differences in gaze patterns were associated with differences in spatial cognition abilities. Additionally, the improvement in performance when using different engineering information formats is associated with different eye-gaze patterns.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | engineering information delivery; eye tracking; labor productivity; spatial cognition |
| Index terms: | variability, option, plumbing, labour productivity, virtual reality, information delivery, field trial, augmented reality, computer aided design, cognition, drawing, 3D printing, physical model |
| Subjects: | technical documentation, visualization, mechanical systems, virtual reality, manufacturing, data collection methods, computational design, cognitive psychology, decision analysis, information systems, statistical analysis, management, manufacturing engineering |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here