Forecasting the number and distribution of new bidders for an upcoming construction auction

Ballesteros-Pérez, P; Skitmore, M; Sanz-Ablanedo, E and Verhoeven, P (2019) Forecasting the number and distribution of new bidders for an upcoming construction auction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(10): 040190561, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Estimating the number of new bidders in construction auctions is relevant for both private companies and contracting authorities. For private companies, it allows the total number of competing bidders to be estimated, which may lead to better adjustments of future bids. For contracting authorities, it allows the population size of all potential bidders to be estimated and thus to implement better awarding criteria. Mathematical models for forecasting the number of new bidders and the population size of all potential bidders are, however, very scarce in the construction management literature. In this paper, we propose an exponential model for predicting the average number of new bidders based on an urn analogy. The model allows the number of new bidders to be estimated as a function of new versus total participating bidders observed in previous auctions. The parameter estimates obtained from the model also allow the statistical distribution of the number of potential new bidders to be modeled using a sum of binomial distributions. We validate the exponential model on three published construction auction data sets, showing that the proposed model significantly outperforms the multinomial model - the most advanced model for performing similar tasks found in the literature.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: auction; bidders; binomial; competitiveness; exponential model; forecasting
Index terms: forecasting, competitiveness, bidder, estimate, mathematical model, multinomial, population, estimating
Subjects: bidding, financial and cost management, prediction and forecasting, mathematical modelling, statistical analysis, demography, market analysis
Topics: Procurement, Research Practice, Cost Management, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here