Novel approach to overcoming discontinuity in knowledge: Application in value-adding frameworks in construction industry

Buhamdan, S; Alwisy, A; Bouferguene, A and Al-Hussein, M (2019) Novel approach to overcoming discontinuity in knowledge: Application in value-adding frameworks in construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(8): 04019045, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Knowledge discontinuity can be a significant obstacle to knowledge growth and accumulation, resulting primarily from the excessive tailoring of borrowed concepts, theories, and approaches. Research in the construction industry is prone to knowledge discontinuity because often after adopting a concept originally developed in another field of study, the link to the original trunk is gradually severed, thus inhibiting research progress. In fact, knowledge discontinuity slows advancement in the construction industry because it is an obstacle to the realization of the benefits achieved in other disciplines by means of the concept, theory, or approach. The research presented in this paper proposes a novel approach to overcoming the discontinuity in knowledge in construction-related research. It uses value-adding practice in the construction industry as a case study, establishing a common understanding of the predominant value-adding frameworks used in the construction industry and providing a measure for the similarity between the selected value-adding frameworks along with the shortcomings of the value-adding practice that need to be addressed. The paper concludes with defining the requirements for a unified framework for value adding in the construction industry.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: grounded theory; knowledge discontinuity; lean construction; lean production systems; target costing; target value design; value adding; value engineering; value management; value-driven design
Index terms: lean production, value engineering, target costing, lean construction, target value design, construction industry, value management, grounded theory, case study
Subjects: data collection methods, value management, building construction, industry analysis, economics, manufacturing engineering, management, theoretical framing
Topics: Cost Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Value Management, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here