Cai, J; Li, S and Cai, H (2019) Empirical analysis of capital structure determinants in infrastructure projects under public-private partnerships. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(5): 04019032, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Public-private partnerships (PPPs) have emerged as a promising alternative to financing infrastructure projects in order to address the infrastructure restoration and rehabilitation challenge. However, in the current practice no unanimous agreement exists on what factors to consider when making capital structure decisions in PPP infrastructure projects. To close this gap, generalized least-squares (GLS) regression analysis was performed on data from 498 projects across 22 countries to identify the capital structure determinants. At the 10% significance level, three project-specific factors (number of sponsors, number of lenders, and contract type) and four country-specific factors (total tax rate, real interest rate, risk premium on lending, and bond market capitalization) were identified as critical. It contributes to the body of knowledge (1) by explaining the financial decision from the lender's perspective, which complements common capital structure theories that focus on sponsors; and (2) by providing sponsors, lenders, and governments with knowledge on the primary factors that drive decisions, which in turn forms the base for effective negotiation and optimization of the capital structure in PPP infrastructure projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | capital structure; generalized least squares regression; project financing; public-private partnership |
| Index terms: | interest rate, financing, restoration, body of knowledge, risk premium, regression analysis, capital structure, negotiation, infrastructure project, determinant, partnership |
| Subjects: | risk assessment, knowledge management, economic analysis, renovation and retrofit, infrastructure and transport systems, statistical analysis, conflict resolution, partnership management |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here