Fuzzy logic model for determining minimum overheads-cum-markup rate

Chao, L C and Liaw, S J (2019) Fuzzy logic model for determining minimum overheads-cum-markup rate. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(4): 04019008, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Contractors in bidding for a construction project often focus on the direct cost and determine a bid price by applying an overheads-cum-markup rate on top of the estimated direct cost. Such a simple method is prone to incorrectness if a rate is charged without a sound basis. As an improvement, a fuzzy logic model is proposed for determining the minimum rate for a project based on the bid position of a contractor. Using the estimates of chance of winning and loss risk as inputs, the model incorporates the bid position in a set of fuzzy rules that reflect the degree of need for work and risk attitude. A regression equation built from bid data for public sector projects connects the ratio of winning bid to owner's budget with project attributes and is used in estimating the chances of winning for various rates. An illustrative example is provided, in which the rules representing the bid positions in nine scenarios were formulated and recent bids in Taiwan were collected for building the regression equation. The results of simulation of bidding for two bidding cases show that the model can differentiate the bid positions and suggest minimum overheads-cum-markup rates consistently. The model may prevent inadequate rates in bidding under intense price competition, thus advancing the field of bidding.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bid position; bids; competition; fuzzy logic; loss risk; markup; overheads; regression analysis
Index terms: Taiwan, risk attitude, construction project, competition, bidding, estimating, direct cost, fuzzy logic, owner, public sector, estimate, regression analysis, overheads
Subjects: financial and cost management, data science, bidding, sociology, market analysis, statistical analysis, financial analysis, administrative law, decision-making and reasoning, economics, production management, Geography
Topics: Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here